13
January 2014Are payday loans as bad as they have been portrayed?
Payday
loans
firms
have
been
well
and
truly
in
the
spotlight
in
the
past
few
months,
with
the
high
nature
of
their
interest
charges,
expensive
default
fees
and
persistent
add
on
costs
contributing
towards
the
negative
publicity
they
have
been
receiving.
With
the
countryís
personal
debt
levels
at
an
all
time
high,
it
is
unsurprising
that
profiteering
companies
such
as
these
have
been
made
the
scapegoat
for
our
monetary
issues.
But
are
these
firms
as
bad
as
they
seem,
and
how
far
have
they
actually
contributed
to
a
more
unstable
financial
community?
The
interest
rates
only
hit
hard
in
the
long
term
Payday
loans
have
notoriously
high
interest
rates
with
most
having
an
APR
of
between
1500%
and
4000%.
This
represents
a
huge
amount
of
interest
to
pay
on
if
you
were
to
borrow
a
loan
for
a
year,
but
the
reality
is
that
most
people
use
them
for
one
to
two
months,
meaning
that
the
impact
of
the
huge
APR
rates
are
not
as
damaging
as
it
may
seem.
If
you
were
to
borrow
£1000
for
a
year
at
4200%
then
this
would
mean
you
would
have
to
pay
back
over
£2500
in
interest
charges.
But
people
forget
that
payday
loan
finance
is
intended
for
short
term
borrowing,
and
as
such
you
would
only
have
to
pay
£250
interest
for
an
£1000
loan.
Yes
this
is
a
lot,
but
on
a
smaller
scale,
a
£25
interest
fee
for
£100
borrowing
is
not
has
potentially
harmful
as
some
media
portrayals
have
made
out.
It
is
worth
remembering
that
payday
loans
are
not
long
term
finance,
and
are
not
suppose
to
substitute
in
for
a
medium
range
loan.
Instead,
they
are
intended
for
one
month
use,
and
in
this
sense,
they
perform
their
function
without
posing
huge
danger
to
the
borrower.
The
problem
it
seems
is
from
the
people
using
them,
as
they
have
chosen
the
wrong
option
for
finance
if
they
intend
to
borrow
for
longer
than
a
month.
Payday
loans,
as
they
sound,
are
suppose
to
cover
the
period
between
one
of
your
paydays
to
the
other,
so
if
used
properly,
by
a
responsible
borrower,
should
not
pose
a
serious
threat
to
someone.
Your
credit
rating
is
damaged-
but
is
it
their
fault?
In
recent
times
it
has
come
to
light
that
applying
or
having
a
history
of
payday
loan
borrowing
damages
your
chances
of
acquiring
credit
or
a
secured
mortgage
from
a
bank,
because
it
negatively
affects
your
credit
file.
The
reality
is
that
the
majority
of
payday
loan
users
probably
applied
for
credit
from
the
bank
initially,
but
were
rejected
due
to
the
strict
criteria
needed
to
obtain
credit
in
todayís
financial
climate.
The
bank
rejection
itself
lowers
their
credit
rating,
which
decreases
their
chances
of
getting
a
loan
from
another
bank.
This
then
turns
people
to
forms
of
finance
where
they
are
likely
to
be
accepted,
i.e.
payday
loan
firms
who
provide
them
with
the
short
term
funding
that
the
bank
refused
to
do.
The
question
here
is
whether
your
credit
rating
being
damaged
is
the
fault
of
the
payday
loan
company
or
the
bank,
as
it
seems
that
bank
rejections
have
a
huge
impact
on
the
number
of
people
using
a
payday
loan
firm.
Yes,
payday
loan
borrowing
suggests
irresponsible
money
management,
but
it
seems
slightly
unfair
for
banks
to
issue
this
verdict
considering
that
they
are
the
biggest
contributor
for
turning
people
to
payday
borrowing.
This
provokes
the
bigger
question;
are
payday
loan
firms
being
used
as
a
scapegoat
for
banks
conduct?
There
fees
can
be
frequent,
but
not
that
high
As
well
as
the
huge
APR
attached
to
them,
Payday
loans
have
also
come
under
fire
for
the
number
of
default
and
interest
charges
they
apply
to
peopleís
accounts.
These
often
equate
to
charges
such
as
£20
fees
a
week,
though
this
is
specified
in
the
initial
contract
that
the
borrower
signs
when
they
make
the
agreement.
From
a
business
perspective,
are
you
inclined
to
just
wait
and
let
someone
recover
if
they
fail
to
uphold
to
their
contractual
agreement?
Perhaps
payday
loan
firms
should
stress
that
loan
terms
are
only
suited
to
single
month
lending,
and
should
emphasise
all
terms
and
conditions
clearly.
However,
The
inference
again
seems
to
be
that
a
large
part
of
the
problem
comes
from
people
in
the
UK,
who
essentially
leaving
themselves
vulnerable
to
money
problems
from
payday
loan
companies
by
signing
up
for
deals
that
they
simply
cannot
afford,
or
are
fully
aware
of.
Yes,
payday
loans
are
dangerous,
and
are
typically
vague
with
their
terms,
placing
them
in
small
print.
But
surely
it
is
time
to
stop
pointing
the
finger
at
institutions,
and
start
focusing
on
our
own
self
improvement.
We
donít
have
to
use
payday
loans.
What
about
peer-peer
finance?
Or
Credit
Unions?
Even
borrowing
from
a
family
member?
All
of
these
options
are
available
to
people
suffering
short
term
financial
difficulties,
but
instead
they
utilise
payday
loan
companies
for
longer
than
a
month,
fail
to
clear
the
balance,
and
then
create
a
furore
about
being
in
default.
Once
youíre
in
default,
the
pressure
cranks
up
Thus
far,
the
greatest
shortcoming
of
payday
loan
firms
seems
to
be
t
heir
intentional
vagueness
and
lack
of
clarity
on
the
full
extent
of
late
and
interest
charges
once
you
go
into
default.
And
it
is
when
you
go
into
default
that
it
can
be
argued
that
the
media
is
at
its
most
accurate
when
criticising
payday
loan
firms,
because
they
are
relentless
in
their
pursuit
of
your
money.
Most
payday
loan
firms
will
launch
a
bombardment
on
your
mail
box
and
phone,
calling
and
mailing
you
over
and
over
again
if
you
go
into
default.
They
will
often
be
threatening,
and
can
make
your
life
and
living
hell
if
you
do
not
act
fast
and
repay
your
debt.
However,
it
should
be
remembered
that
going
into
default
involves
the
borrower
reneging
on
their
payment
agreement
with
the
lender,
meaning
that
it
as
least
partly
the
borrowerís
fault
that
they
find
themselves
in
such
as
harassing
predicament.
Conclusion
Payday
loan
firms
definitely
have
their
shortcomings,
and
are
particularly
bad
when
it
comes
to
debt
repayment.
It
is
also
undoubted
that
they
exploit
the
desperation
of
people
in
debt,
and
try
and
maximise
profit
by
offering
the
chance
to
roll
over
their
loans.
However,
the
media
crusade
against
them
can
be
seen
as
partially
unfair
considering
that
it
was
banks
that
caused
the
economic
downturn,
and
it
banks
who
push
people
towards
them
in
the
first
place.
Furthermore, all of payday loan firms deficiencies are only damaging if the borrower acquires money from them without thinking about the long term repercussions, and anyone who uses a payday loan firm for its actual purpose, to cover payments before their next payday, will not experience any of the turmoil that are identified in the paper. It is time for the people of the UK to start taking responsibility for their financial problems, and stop pointing the finger at the easiest actions to do so.
If
we
all
managed
our
money
well,
and
borrowed
responsibly,
then
we
should
not
need
to
use
payday
loan
firms,
and
wouldnít
fall
into
such
financial
decline
when
using
one.
Clearly
it
is
about
being
more
financially
astute,
and
reading
the
loan
terms
of
all
potential
arrangements,
before
signing
them
and
being
more
aware
of
all
the
financial
institutions
available
to
us
such
as
credit
unions
and
peer-peer
finance.
In
this
way,
we
do
not
put
ourselves
at
risk
of
payday
loan
debt,
and
have
the
right
answers
to
our
problems
should
we
ever
fall
into
short
term
financial
difficulties.
Compare
Loans
with
MoneyExpert.





