Affluent Households paying an average 21,000 more for Houses near to Top State Schools ñ Low-income Families losing out

Hard-up families are being starved of the opportunity to attain places in Britainís top schools, as affluent parents are parting with a premium for house purchases in the vicinity of the best state schools in the country. This actuality, revealed in research conducted by Lloyds Bank, casts shadows over the all-encompassing, uncostly ethos of traditional state schools, and is ominously indicative of the direction the gap between the wealthy and the deprived could be moving in.

The research showed that households were paying an average £21,000 more than average house prices in bordering neighbourhoods for the privilege of residing in the same postcode as top 30 state school.

This added cost was at its weightiest for those seeking to live in the locality of Buckinghamshireís Beaconsfield High School, as buyers seem happy to pay £483,031 more than average property prices in adjacent areas. Students at the school have notoriously achieved highly in years gone by, with 96% of students receiving an A*-B grade in their GCSE examinations for 2013, underlining the attractiveness of the institution for parents seeking the best academic results for their children.

The average price for a house in the same postcode as Beaconsfield High School stood at roughly £797, 000, which according to Lloydsí report is over 18 times as much as average salaries in the same locality. However, this data can be seen as skewed due to the historically enduring affluence of the Beaconsfield locale, and its reputation as a hotspot for commuters to the capital.

Growing Disparity between Affluent and Underprivileged nonetheless, there are growing fears concerning the blasÈ manner in which wealthy households are flexing their financial muscles to manipulate the state school system to their benefit. The purchase of a second home in a top state schoolís postcode, and the paying of costly private tuition fees for entry examinations are other strategies deployed by wealthy families to give their children an advantage to satisfy a top state schoolís entry requirements.

The amount of money saved on private school fees, which could be theoretically afforded by many of the households in question, justifies the exorbitant expense afforded to private tutors in pursuit of a place at a top state school, especially when the quality of education on offer mirrors that of educational establishments such as Beaconsfield High School.

However, it is children from poorer backgrounds who are missing out on these places, and as such, social mobility becomes more problematic in the long term causing many bright young people to feel disenfranchised as their opportunities are marginalised.

The Lloyds Bank study cautions: ìThose on average earnings are finding it difficult to purchase a property close to many of the best state schools.î Conor Ryan, long-term campaigner for poorer childrenís schooling rights & director of research at the Sutton Trust, welcomed the report from Lloyds: ìThis research confirms that access to the best state schools is too often linked to family income … where comprehensive schools prioritise proximity in admissions, they close off access to many who can’t afford the high house prices.î Attempts to enhance social mobility have been plentiful in years gone by, as various governments have prioritised it. Most recently, the Coalition introduced fresh proposals in July which instructed school admission authorities to allow ìpriority for school places to disadvantaged childrenî. Schools would be afforded a ëpupil premiumí varying in amount for primary and secondary school students, with the former valued at £1300 and the latter at £935.

Calls for fairer admission standards have amplified in recent times, with a plethora of suggestions for clever children from low-income families to be prioritised when schools consider prospective students. However, with private tuition fees and tactful property acquirements by wealthy parents, the problem is not being addressed.

A potential introduction of free instructive sessions for prospective students from low-income households seeking to pass entry examinations is a possible solution to level out the playing field.

One thing is for certain, your familyís gross income ought not to affect your childís education.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *